Why Punish Oil Companies
Just When We Need More Energy?
By Dennis Avery
Gasoline at $3 per gallon tells
us vehicle fuel is scarce in America right
now. Some U.S. politicians propose to “fix” the
high prices with an “excess profits tax” on the oil companies.
If you want less of something,
tax it. If you want less fuel at
higher prices, just raise the taxes on the energy companies.
If you want more of something,
raise its price. Willing suppliers then find ways to provide it. Over time, competition and investment
bring down prices.
The excess profits tax is a
political diversion to help you forget that it’s America’s own
voters and politicians who have created our current pain at the gas pump: Many of the “excess profits taxers” have
voted consistently against more energy.
- Bill
Clinton vetoed drilling for the oil in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge,
which could boost U.S. domestic reserves by 50
percent. The oil drilling would
impact about 20 acres of the 1.5 million in the wildlife preserve.
- The
Feds have banned drilling for America’s rich offshore oil deposits, except in
the western Gulf of Mexico. Even Hurricane Katrina failed to cause
any leakage from the big oil wells there.
- America’s oil
refining capacity is strained to the limit, and governments won’t license more
because people don’t want oil refineries in their communities.
- The
EPA now mandates that our gasoline be blended with scarce and expensive
ethanol, even though cars built since 1988 don’t need an “oxygenate.” Supplying 10 percent of our auto fuel
as ethanol would force us to clear 100 million acres of forests for fuel
crops.
- The
Greens shut down safe, economic nuclear power plants with endless lawsuits.
The rest of us let them.
- Even
the Greens are now backing away from costly, ugly wind farms, and solar is
going nowhere.
There’s no shortage of petroleum.
Canada alone has 2500 billion
barrels of oil in the massive Athabasca tar sands, 400 miles north of Montana. That’s 83 years
worth of current world oil consumption. Steam injection can deliver the oil for
$10-13 per barrel, but it will take several years and big bucks to expand tar
sands output importantly.
The first world is highly nervous
about fossil fuels, even though there’s no evidence that burning them has
significantly increased Earth’s temperatures.
Who told us that humans were more
powerful than the sun? In the past
25 years, we’ve found massive global evidence that the Earth has a natural,
moderate 1500-year climate cycle linked to the sun. Deep ice cores from Greenland and
Antarctica say the Medieval Warming in the 12th century and the Roman
Warming in the 1st century were both warmer than today. So do seabed sediments, cave
stalagmites, glaciers and tree rings from around the world. The cycle is at least a million years
old.
Six years ago, Green guilt gave
California its
rolling blackouts. California found that current technology
really offers only two alternatives for powering the modern world: fossil and
nuclear. California opted for more
fossil power plants.
Since then, millions of auto
sales in China and
India have underscored the world’s
rising demand for energy.
China and India
have decided to build both fossil and nuclear power plants, lots of them.
America today faces the same choice that was
forced on California and China.
We need more fossil fuel, more
nuclear plants, or both. Punishing
oil companies will only discourage the increasing energy investments we need.
DENNIS T. AVERY is a senior fellow for Hudson
Institute in Washington, DC and the Director for Global Food Issues (www.cgfi.org). He was formerly
a senior analyst for the Department of State. Readers may write him at
Post Office Box 202, Churchville, VA 24421.